Olympics in Munich? Between vision and responsibility
A review of the expert panel on Munich's Olympic bid on 24.07.2025
What can Munich learn from Paris? What does a possible bid for the 2036, 2040 or 2044 Olympic Games mean for urban development, transportation and society? The panel with top-class guests from politics, science and journalism discussed these questions intensively - critically, factually, but also visionary.
"The blueprint of Munich 72 is exactly what the critics of Olympic gigantomania actually want."
With this assessment Roman Deininger (Süddeutsche Zeitung) introduced the evening. He looked back on the 1972 Games, which he described as a "historic exception", in contrast to previous and subsequent editions. He raised the question of whether such an exceptional situation was possible again under today's economic, social and institutional conditions, particularly in relation to the International Olympic Committee.
Doubts about promises and economic benefits
Dr. Nadia Alaily-Mattar (TUM), an urban researcher, spoke in a differentiated manner about the real benefits of mega-events: "Costs and benefits can be estimated, but not proven, both before and after the event." She referred to sometimes unrealistic profitability forecasts, such as in the case of Brisbane 2032, where a benefit of 17.6 billion Australian dollars was forecast. These studies are often characterized by "optimism bias". She also takes a differentiated, socially critical view of the impact of major sporting events. "A key point is how costs and benefits are distributed in time, space and socially," she emphasized. Alaily-Mattar explained that some people will suffer immediately from construction measures, while others may only benefit from the resulting advantages years later or not at all.
Paris as a role model - but with a sense of proportion
A highlight of the evening was the report by the French Consul General Alexandre A. Vulic. He emphasized: "Paris 24 was an event like no other." He cited impressive figures: 6.6 million tourists, 2.7 billion euros in additional expenditure, a carbon footprint reduced by half. He particularly emphasized the change in mobility: "100% of the competition venues were accessible by public transport ... the transport offer was also expanded with 450 free shuttle buses." The cleaning of the Seine was also a symbolic legacy, he emphasized. Since July 5, it has been possible to swim again in three supervised areas, which is seen as a promise kept by the Games.
Traffic turnaround through the Olympics? Possible, but not automatically.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. Gebhard Wulfhorst (TUM) saw an Olympic bid as an opportunity to significantly advance key transport projects such as the second S-Bahn main line. In his view, such major events could significantly accelerate decision-making processes. At the same time, however, he warned against expecting too much. It is not enough to simply create additional lanes, he said, a comprehensive pricing strategy for the entire transport sector is required that does not just focus on motorized private transport.
Paris on two wheels - a living example of change
Ingvar Perovanovich reported on his documentary bicycle tour through European cycling cities, during which he was particularly impressed by Paris. There was no need to look specifically for prestige projects, he said, because regardless of the location, it was clear everywhere that the city was undergoing change. He described how central traffic axes had been transformed into wide cycle lanes. A large part of the road surface in Paris is now dedicated to cycling. Perovanovich was convinced that the consistent expansion of cycling infrastructure would lead directly to increased use.
Conclusion: Between feasibility and courage
The panel made it clear that an Olympic bid is not a sure-fire success. Although it offers potential for progress in areas such as infrastructure, urban development and climate policy, it also harbors considerable risks if it is not designed in a balanced and responsible manner. According to Dr. Alaily-Mattar, it is therefore crucial to carefully consider in advance "what we want to achieve with the bid that we are otherwise unable to achieve."
Develop the next mobility innovations for metropolitan regions. Together. Possible. To make it happen.
In 2025, representatives from various municipalities regularly met as part of a Community of Practice to exchange ideas on meaningful practices with urban data for sustainable mobility.
A recent study from the ReMIX environment investigates, through urban experiments in Munich, how specific mobility futures are made effective by three central performative mechanisms.
How can questions of equitable mobility be jointly researched and shaped? The seminar „Planning for Mobility Justice“ at the TU Munich highlights different perspectives on mobility (in)justice.
How can mobility innovations be designed responsibly — and what political frameworks are needed for this?
At re:publica 2026 in Berlin, MCube was represented at Europe's largest digital and society conference – with all 21 cluster and campus initiatives of the BMFTR.
5,000 guests, many insights: TUM's Sustainability Day made sustainable innovation tangible.
MCube Consulting is introducing SmartEvent, a digital tool that makes event registration in Munich easier and more efficient through the use of geodata.
The new study shows: Every euro invested in public transport in the MVV generates almost four times the economic value added.
Electric, autonomous, networked: The logistics industry is facing a major transformation. The MCube Speaker Series at the Deutsches Museum discussed how this future can become reality.
What is MOSAIQ?
Imagine something: There is more space for people. The streets have more trees and plants. Everyone can get around better. That's how your Schwabing-West district could be in the future. How would you like your district to be? We want to talk to you about it!
The project is called MOSAIQ. MOSAIQ is a research∙project. MOSAIQ means: Mobility and urban climate in the future city∙part. The Technical University of Munich is leading the project.
What is MOSAIQ about?
MOSAIQ wants to make the streets in the city∙part more beautiful. People should feel comfortable there. There should be more space. For meetings and plants, for example. You can help decide what is tried out in the Stadt∙teil. The ideas come from you. Some ideas will be tried out on the streets for a certain period of time.
The aim of MOSAIQ is to make urban districts good places to live.
At the same time, the climate in the city should improve. And people should be able to move around the city easily.
What is happening in the district?
